When discussing signal levels and power output, hams like to say things like:
Using higher power isn’t important because it only gives you one additional S unit
and
You’ll lose some power in the coax but you won’t even notice a few dB
These statements are often true and at the same time may be completely wrong. I’ve noticed that radio amateurs pushing the limits of their station pay close attention to every decibel they gain or lose. This is especially true at VHF/UHF frequencies where signals may be weak. A dB here, a dB there, the next thing you know it adds up to something big!
Definitions
First, let’s make sure we have a few definitions right. The decibel (dB) is defined as the ratio of two power levels:
dB = 10 log (P2/P1)
One decibel corresponds to a 26% increase in power level. A well-known rule of thumb is that doubling the power corresponds to a 3 dB increase. Similarly, chopping the power in half drops the signal level by 3 dB. A 10 times increase in power is 10 dB. (Voltage can also be used to calculate decibel relationships but to keep it simple, I’ll just use power.)
The S Unit is normally defined as a 6-dB change in signal level, which is a factor of 4 in power. (Your S meter may or may not actually follow this rule but that is a topic for another day.)
Power Level
Let’s compare a few different power levels to get a feel for how decibels and S units behave. Let’s use a 5 watt QRP level as our reference power. If we crank up the power to 100 watts, we have 10 log (100/5) = 13 dB increase in power level. This is slightly more than two S units (2 x 6 dB), so we would expect the S meter on the other end to read 2 units higher.
Now suppose we kick in our linear amplifier to produce a 1 kilowatt RF signal. This power level is 10 log (1000/5) = 23 dB higher than the 5 watt signal, or roughly four S units.
Now if our QRP signal was a solid S9 to start with, adding another 23 dB on top of it may not be that significant. The station can be heard at S9 or can be heard even louder at S9 + 23 dB. Except when there’s a pile of stations all calling that rare DX…then the loudest station tends to be heard. Crafty operating skill and good luck may overcome the power difference.
But consider the other extreme. Our QRP station is being heard right at the noise floor on the receive end. The two stations are struggling to complete the contact and the propagation path degrades by 2 dB. Now the QRP station is below the noise and uncopyable. We increase our power to 100 watts and gain 2 S units…still not very strong but the ability to receive the signal improves dramatically. Crank it up to 1000 watts and you gain another couple of S units and the copy is quite good. The key point is that changes in signal level matter most at the margin, when you can just barely copy the signal. (By the way, there is nothing wrong with running QRP…many ops enjoy the challenge of making contacts with low power.)
At the receiver, our ability to recover the signal is determined by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A higher noise floor at the receiver means it will be more difficult to hear the signal coming in. The type of modulation being used may also make a big difference. Good old CW and the WSJT modes use a narrower bandwidth and will get through when wider-band modulation (SSB, FM) fails. In all cases, a stronger signal works better.
Antennas
Antenna systems also increase our signal level…and they do it for both transmit and receive. I recently did some comparisons of VHF antennas from a SOTA summit. My 2m Yagi antenna has 6 dB of gain (referenced to a dipole) and my comparisons showed that the performance of this antenna was good enough to pull some signals out of the noise to be solid copy. This occurred when the other station’s signal was right at the noise floor (using my lower gain antennas) such that the 6 dB improvement had a significant impact.
Sometimes hams will say that VHF is just line-of-sight propagation and that the signal level doesn’t matter much. This is partially true but often we are stretching for contacts beyond line-of-sight. Take a look at this article: The Myth of VHF Line-Of-Sight. This is another case where we are operating on the margin and every dB matters.
Feedline loss can cause us to lose decibels, which impacts both transmit and receive performance. If your coaxial cable is short, then the losses may be negligible. Increasing cable length and increasing frequency produce more loss. For example, 100 feet of RG-8X has only 1.1 dB of loss at 10 MHz. Increase the frequency to 146 MHz and the loss jumps to 4.5 dB, using the Times Microwave cable calculator. That means 50 watts of power at the transmitter turns into 17.7 watts at the other end of the cable. Using LMR-400 coax reduces the attenuation to 1.5 dB.
Summary
You can choose to ignore small changes in your signal level. A dB here or there may not make a big difference with casual ham radio operating. But these losses tend to add up and may become significant. Most importantly, just a few dB may be the critical difference between making a radio contact or not, when operating at the margin.
Like E. Dirksen on the federal budget … “a billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money.” Same with dB, right.
I’ve noticed that very few HAMs fine tune stuff, and instead just fire up the 600W or 1KW amp and blast away, esp on 20 & 40 M. I went out with the local club to try to help new hams make their first couple DX QSOs, and it was really disappointing to hear Radio Free Kansas or some dude in Georgia w/ 1KW just dominating the airwaves . One really smart young man (about 17yo, new general lic) asked my why he should spend his time and money on this when he has e-mail and social messaging to communicate with people, because firing up a station like 850 KOA and the Blowtorch of the Rockies is, well, not all that cool and interesting, even from an engineering perspective. Several folks told him to get a IC 7300 or other SDR, and he could then use the waterfalls, etc. to dial it in. Beyond taking thousands of dollars (amp, IC 7300, antenna, shack) I told him the answer is, wait for it … SOTA. It’s on a hilltop with a wire and 10W that, for me at least, you really see the fascinating aspects of radio at play. Just my thing, and no judgement. Note that I very rarely play with my QTH station because all I have is 100W, and on contest weekends, it’s pointless, no matter how well I have tweaked my antenna.
” One really smart young man (about 17yo, new general lic) asked my why he should spend his time and money on this when he has e-mail and social messaging to communicate with people”
If all you want to do is communicate with people, ham radio is a waste of time. Ham radio is not for talking, it is for having fun messing around with radios.
See https://www.k0nr.com/wordpress/2011/07/amateur-radio-is-not-for-talking/
With apologies to Monty Python:
“Every dB is sacred,
Every dB is great.
If a dB is wasted,
Marconi gets quite irate.”
OK, I’ll stop now and go back to twiddling knobs.
Thanks, Rob!